I was suspicious when all the countries fell into line, and that Johns Hopkins had a complete website up and running in January 2020 which would have taken months to build because of its Covid-tracking ability and eye-catching design. Then and there I said to myself "They're up to something and I'm not taking it." Later I learned that Congress and staff were exempt and that the illegals coming across the border didn't get it.
A friend said the same thing. He was on YouTube and saw a banner ad right when 2 weeks to flatten the curve started. He called bullshit, "Real pandemics don't have a slick marketing rollout"
My take: Vaccine manufacturers only have liability projection from being sued by "US citizens."
US law does not apply to the illegals because they are "non-US citizens" a/k/a "visiting sovereigns" and can sue if they were damaged by a medical procedure required as a condition of entry.
And mRNA/ spike is used to cover up for the lipids toxicity.
They took a failed tech and pushed it out.
From an article in 2017:
"For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients."
They lied so blatantly about the immunology (eg mucosal immune responses vs adaptive serum ones) surrounding covid and mRNA transfections, that anyone in their right mind would want to analyze the fundamental claims that form the foundation of vaccinology.
Excellent analysis Jeremiah! You reminded me of the wisdom of Mr. Justice Brandeis, my favorite jurist of all time. He noted that "The right most valued by all civilized men is the right to be left alone."
And another of his relevant to these times: "The greatest menace to freedom is an inert people"
(👎) One who employs the government or other administrative bodies to resolve their personal problems with his/her neighbor, often in the form of fines, threats, and coercion.
>"If you are not harming anyone, you should be left alone."
This is a common law rule, which is what all of our laws are supposed to be based on. We've come a long way from that though, and only the few people who know the fundamentals AND how to navigate the convoluted and complex legal system are able to live that way. Bill Thornton is one. His site is 1215.org
>"If products are harming people one, they should not be allowed to continue to be on the market "
They can be allowed on the market if the appropriate labels and warnings on there, such that every buyer is aware. This is "informed consent." You can sell vaccines if you make the buyer aware of the dangers. But yea, saying that it's "safe and effective" should be illegal at this point. And the state should not pay for it.
Though, this sort of stuff gets backwards when products are deemed harmful when they are not. Who makes the determination? That's the question.
Thank you from an original anti-vaxxer. I grew up with a father in the military and had to have vaccinations throughout childhood for travel abroad. They included vaccinations other people didn't receive like cholera, typhoid, and typhus. I had severe reactions at times. As soon as I was old enough to stand against my parents, I said "no" to vaccinations as we were living solely in the U.S. I joined anti-vaxx sites as an adult and kept up on "vaccination science." I knew that mRNA technology had never received approval for nearly 1 1/2 decades because the monkeys died in Phase 3 prior to March 2020. I knew that the injections were untried and untested and no way could an mRNA injectable be developed in 9 months. Initially, I wondered about the bioengineered structure of the "Covid virus" and wondered if transmission could occur from an asymptomatic person. With what dystopian plague were we dealing? Within a few weeks, I was disabused of my wonder when the curve never flattened and queer actions like putting Covid-sick people in nursing and long-term care facilities for the elderly, the most vulnerable segment of society, occurred. Then, I knew. They were culling the population.
Thanks, Jeremiah. I liked your advice to take action on a local level as well. I'm part of a NYC group called Medical Freedom Alliance, dedicated to preserving body autonomy. You can check us out at www.mfany.org . I personally run point on the holistic health initiative there, called Vital Health, and am a former conventional medical worker, so I KNOW that they do NOT always have your best interest at heart. I particularly loved this sentence of yours: "They followed instructions very well to get where they are, and they are very offended by people who do not follow instructions eagerly and automatically as they do". Well-said, fellow New Yorker! You can also reach me directly at JoannaVitalHealth@protonmail.com . --Joanna, Your Sister Warrior
Some anti-vaxxers even understand that the entire concept of "contagious diseases"--THE excuse for vaccines in the first place--is wrong. Read Cowan & Morell's THE CONTAGION MYTH.
indeed. when I came here, they jabbed me without even asking me if I had been vaxxed before. Immigrant. Jab. 7 at once. My first attempt was denied, and the second time, at least the doc omitted 3, only 4 jabs... when asked if this was not dangerous, he said, oh no, no harm at all. What did he know? This is obviously mandatory if you enter the country legally. I wonder about all these illegals.
IMHO this unending torrent of undocumented humanity is merely a self-replenishing reservoir of the most desperate--and consequently most eager and compliant--guinea pigs in this ongoing experiment.
i don’t have kids, so i didn’t have to make the decisions that GenX parents had to make in the wake of the 1986 law that gave full immunity to vx makers. it wasn’t until i caught up with some old buds on FB that i learned anything about this stuff (as as it applies to pets, too).
many who are called ‘anti-vaxxer’ are parents of vx injured kids. few ppl my age have reason to think twice about vaccination b/c we got our 6 shots as kids and that was that. now the schedule calls for [what looks to be] 57 shots, not counting a twice-yearly covid shot. when a child is fine, goes in for a shot, and is mute and won’t make eye contact the very next day, we need to *listen to mothers* instead of insulting and ridiculing them.
my friends who turned their back on this have amazing, happy, healthy young adults now. no autism. no adhd. unlike others i know who did the schedule as told to. a lot of it had to do with a family’s resources. those who refused had the wealth and security to be self-sufficient and homeschool. the ones who did were living month-to-month, barely hanging on, and vaccines were the LAST thing on their minds—and prolly still aren’t on their radar.
Leighton Woodhouse posted a fantastic piece on addiction and mental health in the US today and I couldn’t help be think of the excerpt below as I read your essay. here’s the link: https://public.substack.com/p/the-freedom-to-die
Leighton identifies two competing philosophical traditions that clash in the US: Yankee Puritans who seek to perfect humans thru technocracy, and Greater Appalachia Scots-Irish anti-authoritarians who’ll mess you up if you try to ‘perfect’ them. I spent enough time in Appalachia to appreciate that vibe. Plus, i’m like 1000% Irish. What follows is a long excerpt that i think is relevant to your thesis:
In American Nations, Colin Woodard expands upon the thesis of David Hackett Fischer’s canonical 1989 book, Albion’s Seed, which argued that America was founded by four disparate cultures, each representing a different cohort of migrants from a distinct region of England. Woodard goes further, identifying eleven separate American “nations.” Two of those nations, both common to Fischer’s and Woodard’s respective cultural geographies, best embody the two rival definitions of “freedom.” One is the New England Puritanical tradition, which Woodard refers to as “Yankeedom.” The other is the warrior culture of the Scots-Irish clans that settled what Woodard calls “Greater Appalachia.”
The Puritans believed that humans were inherently wicked and that our behavior could only be aligned with God and the greater good by the imposition of authority. Our “rights” as citizens are, in fact, privileges granted to us by the commonwealth, to which we owe our survival; without government, we would collapse into violence and mayhem. We have no “freedom” without the paternalistic, coercive, conforming control of the state. Fischer refers to this political philosophy as “ordered liberty.”
The Scots-Irish notion of freedom could not have been more different. These settlers came from the borderlands of the north of England, the north of Ireland, and the Scottish lowlands, which had been an anarchic war zone for the better part of a millennium. The borderlanders’ only experience of “government” was the invading armies of the Scottish and English kings, who trampled, pillaged, and burned their lands in their endless wars over the frontiers of their domains for 700 years. From this experience, a hatred of authority, a violent warrior ethos, and a jealous defense of the natural liberties of the self-sufficient individual were born. The settlers took this culture with them to the Appalachian backcountry, from which it spread to the south and the west of the United States.
The Greater Appalachian nation brought to American politics our reflexive distrust of top-down institutions, while Yankee culture infused us with its opposite: the relentless urge to improve the human community through social engineering. Our wildly oscillating treatment of the insane has been shaped by this philosophical contradiction. It was in Yankee Massachusetts that the rehabilitative vision of the mental asylum was born — a vision that may have endured were it not for the incurability of the severest mental disorders, which, over a century, transformed the asylum from a place of optimism and transformation to a warehouse of human despair and hopelessness. In the face of the asylum’s dismal failure, the Appalachian anti-authoritarian cult of individualism prevailed over the Yankee faith in top-down reform and assimilation.
We live in the wake of that triumph. Even in progressive, big-government blue states, such libertarian precepts as “bodily autonomy” and “the right to refuse treatment” dictate our public policies over addiction and mental illness. But as Gong shows us, these lofty principles are not what families that can afford other options choose when their loved ones need help. The kind of “freedom” we give to the poor when they’re in crisis — the freedom to live on the street, to be controlled by their delusions, and to abuse drugs until they die — is what the rich liquidate their savings to avoid. Because it isn’t freedom at all. It is abandonment.
Jeremiah, don't forget about the National Vaccine Information Center, the organization formed back in 1982 by Barbara Loe Fisher: nvic.org. I myself have been an anti-vaxxer since 1976. I'd became a vegan five years prior, and when the swine flu scare prompted a vax to be rushed into use (and which ultimately proved to be a major disaster) I knew instinctively this procedure was not for me, or anybody.
What wiped out the infectious diseases of the past was not vaccines, which has taken the credit, but rather the public health advances of the 20th Century, e.g., indoor plumbing, running hot and cold water, indoor flush toilets, refrigeration, year-round fresh food, food inspections. And perverse as it seems, even automobiles were a great environmental improvement over the horse-drawn carriages that fouled the streets with their droppings, to be eventually scattered and dispersed into the atmosphere, creating air pollution. Gas powered automobiles were initially a radical improvement to that situation.
Glad to see another fine writer using the term "biosecurity state." For the best analysis of how the term applies, read Aaron Kheriaty's essential The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Bio-Security State.
I lost a daughter to cancer in her teens and that was enough to show me the bigger picture and what has been covered up all these years. That was my starting point
It only took me a physician (the late great Dr. V. Zelenko) talking to a group of Rabbis saying the shots were meant to kill us. It clicked immediately with me although I was doing research for a while. Now I’m awake, have been, and will not “sleep,” again! This article voices my critical thinking I resonate with.
I was suspicious when all the countries fell into line, and that Johns Hopkins had a complete website up and running in January 2020 which would have taken months to build because of its Covid-tracking ability and eye-catching design. Then and there I said to myself "They're up to something and I'm not taking it." Later I learned that Congress and staff were exempt and that the illegals coming across the border didn't get it.
A friend said the same thing. He was on YouTube and saw a banner ad right when 2 weeks to flatten the curve started. He called bullshit, "Real pandemics don't have a slick marketing rollout"
My take: Vaccine manufacturers only have liability projection from being sued by "US citizens."
US law does not apply to the illegals because they are "non-US citizens" a/k/a "visiting sovereigns" and can sue if they were damaged by a medical procedure required as a condition of entry.
Vaccines and viruses are a story to inject toxic crap.
Polio was used to cover up the real causes, pesticides.. DDT
https://aldhissla.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-fact-checkers-claims
And mRNA/ spike is used to cover up for the lipids toxicity.
They took a failed tech and pushed it out.
From an article in 2017:
"For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients."
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
They lied so blatantly about the immunology (eg mucosal immune responses vs adaptive serum ones) surrounding covid and mRNA transfections, that anyone in their right mind would want to analyze the fundamental claims that form the foundation of vaccinology.
Excellent analysis Jeremiah! You reminded me of the wisdom of Mr. Justice Brandeis, my favorite jurist of all time. He noted that "The right most valued by all civilized men is the right to be left alone."
And another of his relevant to these times: "The greatest menace to freedom is an inert people"
> stat·ist
(👎) One who employs the government or other administrative bodies to resolve their personal problems with his/her neighbor, often in the form of fines, threats, and coercion.
>"If you are not harming anyone, you should be left alone."
This is a common law rule, which is what all of our laws are supposed to be based on. We've come a long way from that though, and only the few people who know the fundamentals AND how to navigate the convoluted and complex legal system are able to live that way. Bill Thornton is one. His site is 1215.org
>"If products are harming people one, they should not be allowed to continue to be on the market "
They can be allowed on the market if the appropriate labels and warnings on there, such that every buyer is aware. This is "informed consent." You can sell vaccines if you make the buyer aware of the dangers. But yea, saying that it's "safe and effective" should be illegal at this point. And the state should not pay for it.
Though, this sort of stuff gets backwards when products are deemed harmful when they are not. Who makes the determination? That's the question.
Dissolving Illusions is now the Amazon bestseller in the 'Viral Diseases' category: https://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/14170/ref=zg_b_bs_14170_1
Great piece, thanks! I’m with you on the respect for the OGs who knew all along. (I’m now a proud anti-vaxxer myself). And yeah it’s incredible how many people showed themselves as closet authoritarians. I also wrote about consent and the hypocrisy of those who claim to believe in "My Body, My Choice" recently: https://open.substack.com/pub/sanefrancisco/p/happy-international-womens-day?r=20ejh&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Thank you from an original anti-vaxxer. I grew up with a father in the military and had to have vaccinations throughout childhood for travel abroad. They included vaccinations other people didn't receive like cholera, typhoid, and typhus. I had severe reactions at times. As soon as I was old enough to stand against my parents, I said "no" to vaccinations as we were living solely in the U.S. I joined anti-vaxx sites as an adult and kept up on "vaccination science." I knew that mRNA technology had never received approval for nearly 1 1/2 decades because the monkeys died in Phase 3 prior to March 2020. I knew that the injections were untried and untested and no way could an mRNA injectable be developed in 9 months. Initially, I wondered about the bioengineered structure of the "Covid virus" and wondered if transmission could occur from an asymptomatic person. With what dystopian plague were we dealing? Within a few weeks, I was disabused of my wonder when the curve never flattened and queer actions like putting Covid-sick people in nursing and long-term care facilities for the elderly, the most vulnerable segment of society, occurred. Then, I knew. They were culling the population.
Great point.
Thanks, Jeremiah. I liked your advice to take action on a local level as well. I'm part of a NYC group called Medical Freedom Alliance, dedicated to preserving body autonomy. You can check us out at www.mfany.org . I personally run point on the holistic health initiative there, called Vital Health, and am a former conventional medical worker, so I KNOW that they do NOT always have your best interest at heart. I particularly loved this sentence of yours: "They followed instructions very well to get where they are, and they are very offended by people who do not follow instructions eagerly and automatically as they do". Well-said, fellow New Yorker! You can also reach me directly at JoannaVitalHealth@protonmail.com . --Joanna, Your Sister Warrior
Some anti-vaxxers even understand that the entire concept of "contagious diseases"--THE excuse for vaccines in the first place--is wrong. Read Cowan & Morell's THE CONTAGION MYTH.
Proudly unvaccinated and never to be jabbed
Good for you!! Me too!😁
indeed. when I came here, they jabbed me without even asking me if I had been vaxxed before. Immigrant. Jab. 7 at once. My first attempt was denied, and the second time, at least the doc omitted 3, only 4 jabs... when asked if this was not dangerous, he said, oh no, no harm at all. What did he know? This is obviously mandatory if you enter the country legally. I wonder about all these illegals.
IMHO this unending torrent of undocumented humanity is merely a self-replenishing reservoir of the most desperate--and consequently most eager and compliant--guinea pigs in this ongoing experiment.
What's really ugly are the various neighbours of mine that are still willingly all for vaxxes, yet complain about their health.
Also weird: pro-Ukraine and pro-Israel.
Do the "Experimental Gene Therapeutics" have the ability of making the receivers brain-dead compliant?
i don’t have kids, so i didn’t have to make the decisions that GenX parents had to make in the wake of the 1986 law that gave full immunity to vx makers. it wasn’t until i caught up with some old buds on FB that i learned anything about this stuff (as as it applies to pets, too).
many who are called ‘anti-vaxxer’ are parents of vx injured kids. few ppl my age have reason to think twice about vaccination b/c we got our 6 shots as kids and that was that. now the schedule calls for [what looks to be] 57 shots, not counting a twice-yearly covid shot. when a child is fine, goes in for a shot, and is mute and won’t make eye contact the very next day, we need to *listen to mothers* instead of insulting and ridiculing them.
my friends who turned their back on this have amazing, happy, healthy young adults now. no autism. no adhd. unlike others i know who did the schedule as told to. a lot of it had to do with a family’s resources. those who refused had the wealth and security to be self-sufficient and homeschool. the ones who did were living month-to-month, barely hanging on, and vaccines were the LAST thing on their minds—and prolly still aren’t on their radar.
Leighton Woodhouse posted a fantastic piece on addiction and mental health in the US today and I couldn’t help be think of the excerpt below as I read your essay. here’s the link: https://public.substack.com/p/the-freedom-to-die
Leighton identifies two competing philosophical traditions that clash in the US: Yankee Puritans who seek to perfect humans thru technocracy, and Greater Appalachia Scots-Irish anti-authoritarians who’ll mess you up if you try to ‘perfect’ them. I spent enough time in Appalachia to appreciate that vibe. Plus, i’m like 1000% Irish. What follows is a long excerpt that i think is relevant to your thesis:
In American Nations, Colin Woodard expands upon the thesis of David Hackett Fischer’s canonical 1989 book, Albion’s Seed, which argued that America was founded by four disparate cultures, each representing a different cohort of migrants from a distinct region of England. Woodard goes further, identifying eleven separate American “nations.” Two of those nations, both common to Fischer’s and Woodard’s respective cultural geographies, best embody the two rival definitions of “freedom.” One is the New England Puritanical tradition, which Woodard refers to as “Yankeedom.” The other is the warrior culture of the Scots-Irish clans that settled what Woodard calls “Greater Appalachia.”
The Puritans believed that humans were inherently wicked and that our behavior could only be aligned with God and the greater good by the imposition of authority. Our “rights” as citizens are, in fact, privileges granted to us by the commonwealth, to which we owe our survival; without government, we would collapse into violence and mayhem. We have no “freedom” without the paternalistic, coercive, conforming control of the state. Fischer refers to this political philosophy as “ordered liberty.”
The Scots-Irish notion of freedom could not have been more different. These settlers came from the borderlands of the north of England, the north of Ireland, and the Scottish lowlands, which had been an anarchic war zone for the better part of a millennium. The borderlanders’ only experience of “government” was the invading armies of the Scottish and English kings, who trampled, pillaged, and burned their lands in their endless wars over the frontiers of their domains for 700 years. From this experience, a hatred of authority, a violent warrior ethos, and a jealous defense of the natural liberties of the self-sufficient individual were born. The settlers took this culture with them to the Appalachian backcountry, from which it spread to the south and the west of the United States.
The Greater Appalachian nation brought to American politics our reflexive distrust of top-down institutions, while Yankee culture infused us with its opposite: the relentless urge to improve the human community through social engineering. Our wildly oscillating treatment of the insane has been shaped by this philosophical contradiction. It was in Yankee Massachusetts that the rehabilitative vision of the mental asylum was born — a vision that may have endured were it not for the incurability of the severest mental disorders, which, over a century, transformed the asylum from a place of optimism and transformation to a warehouse of human despair and hopelessness. In the face of the asylum’s dismal failure, the Appalachian anti-authoritarian cult of individualism prevailed over the Yankee faith in top-down reform and assimilation.
We live in the wake of that triumph. Even in progressive, big-government blue states, such libertarian precepts as “bodily autonomy” and “the right to refuse treatment” dictate our public policies over addiction and mental illness. But as Gong shows us, these lofty principles are not what families that can afford other options choose when their loved ones need help. The kind of “freedom” we give to the poor when they’re in crisis — the freedom to live on the street, to be controlled by their delusions, and to abuse drugs until they die — is what the rich liquidate their savings to avoid. Because it isn’t freedom at all. It is abandonment.
72 before the annual covid ones
Jeremiah, don't forget about the National Vaccine Information Center, the organization formed back in 1982 by Barbara Loe Fisher: nvic.org. I myself have been an anti-vaxxer since 1976. I'd became a vegan five years prior, and when the swine flu scare prompted a vax to be rushed into use (and which ultimately proved to be a major disaster) I knew instinctively this procedure was not for me, or anybody.
What wiped out the infectious diseases of the past was not vaccines, which has taken the credit, but rather the public health advances of the 20th Century, e.g., indoor plumbing, running hot and cold water, indoor flush toilets, refrigeration, year-round fresh food, food inspections. And perverse as it seems, even automobiles were a great environmental improvement over the horse-drawn carriages that fouled the streets with their droppings, to be eventually scattered and dispersed into the atmosphere, creating air pollution. Gas powered automobiles were initially a radical improvement to that situation.
Glad to see another fine writer using the term "biosecurity state." For the best analysis of how the term applies, read Aaron Kheriaty's essential The New Abnormal: The Rise of the Bio-Security State.
I lost a daughter to cancer in her teens and that was enough to show me the bigger picture and what has been covered up all these years. That was my starting point
Please accept my humble condolences.
It only took me a physician (the late great Dr. V. Zelenko) talking to a group of Rabbis saying the shots were meant to kill us. It clicked immediately with me although I was doing research for a while. Now I’m awake, have been, and will not “sleep,” again! This article voices my critical thinking I resonate with.