The Grand Unveiling

Through Covid, much has been revealed about people...

The manufactured crisis that was covid-19 turned out to be a grand unveiling of sorts. Much was revealed about the American public and the global public. Additionally, much was revealed about our family, friends, and in some cases now former friends. 

In a relatively short period of time, everyone was generally divided into two camps — The Covidians (The Branch Covidians) and the Covidiots. But as is always the case when things are bifurcated in this manner, an illusion is created — an illusion of uniformity. But naturally, the more insightful perspective is the one that has navigated into the grey areas — following the nuances and contours of human psychology as demonstrated in everyday life. 

For example, 81% of the U.S. (supposedly) got a covid shot. Within that 81% (we'll just go with that number for now without questioning it) there are a lot of subcategories of people. It would be incorrect to simply say, "81% of the population is adamantly pro-vax." Out of the 81% immediately you have the group that took one shot and never took a second (to "complete the series") for the mere fact that they had a severe or at least significantly unpleasant reaction to the first. That group gets divided again into people who had a bad reaction, got over it and have "felt fine" ever since and others who had a bad reaction and then continued to suffer from ongoing health problems. The number of people who went on to get their second shot to be considered "fully vaccinated" before officials admitted that these shots would require ongoing, never ending in fact, boosters after implying the initial series would provide lasting protection — drops down to 70%.

Another sub-segment of the 81% are people who had no interest in, or desire for, these injections from a medical point of view, but succumbed to the social and economic pressure. Being threatened with loss of employment was the coup de grace for many who were resistant in the first place. Again, that group could be divided further into people who said, "oh well, I'll just get the shot" and didn't think much of it and people who felt truly coerced and violated, but ultimately felt no choice but to submit in lieu of looming insolvency and even homelessness. In fact, it was the coercive mandates that lifted the percentage of recipients from a number barely over 50% to the supposed 81%. There are many many people whose explanation for their "decision" was simply, "I didn't want to take it, but I did because I couldn't afford to lose my job."  

A third, relatively small group (at this time), which might prove to be critical in the larger struggle, are people who have realized they've been conned. They bought-in to the pharma-prop in the first place, had the wherewithal to notice an incongruity or two and then demonstrated the maturity necessary to change their minds and update their understanding. This group, should be commended because like Mark Twain famously said, “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” The past 4 years have highlighted how correct and insightful Mr. Twain was when he produced this famous remark.  

Many subgroups could be extracted from the initial 81% until it gets whittled down to a core of bonafide vaccine-zealots. Many pretended to be true-blue pro-vaxxers, but in reality, that is a very small group as indicated by the remarkably small percentage of people who have "kept up to date" with their boosters. It seems less than 3% of the US population has continued to "follow the science." What started out as an army has now been reduced to a small cadre.

Do you see how the image of a monolithic 81% begins to crumble starting with the initial drop down to 70% when we remove the people who took the first shot but never took the second. The popularity of these frankenjabs then proceeds to erode further with each "booster." The "uptake" — booster, after boosters, after booster is a steep slope downward until we arrive all the way down to the diminished number of less than 3% who are fully "up to date."

So after all of the hoopla, and all of the fanfare, it turns out that the anti-vaxxers are not merely some marginalized group after all. We're actually a significantly larger group than the people who could remain truly committed to the original narrative. Everyone else was and is just putting up a front. They are faking the funk, so to speak.

That was the view through binoculars. Now let's use a magnifying glass and take a look at some of the odd personality types that have been observed in the malaise. The following, are a few archetypes that I have come across, extracted from everyday life, representing perspectives that will simply not be accounted for if we view everything through the lens of the overly simplistic bifurcation of "pro vs. anti."

1) The Loyalist — The Loyalist follows the instructions of the party with total obedience. Their loyalty is akin to hypnosis. If an instruction contradicts a previous instruction, the previous instruction is erased from their mental inventory. For example, the phenomenal fact that Biden, Harris, and Pelosi, all expressed logical skepticism about a rushed Trump vaccine. They also went on to say, independent of each other, that they wouldn't and couldn't mandate emergency use authorization "vaccines." However, within months, they completely contradicted those statements — not just with words, but with abusive policies. They were never questioned anywhere about these contradictions in the corporate media. And more disturbingly, rank and file party members did not comment on it whatsoever. They simply carried out the next series of directives. Within the party, a Loyalist could not say, "I didn't trust the Trump vaccine and I still do not trust the Trump vaccine." That would be considered totally unacceptable. When the figureheads of the party change their minds, you (the rank and file party member) must change your mind too — like an automaton.

I would also add that there is a special, almost elite segment of this group that I would call The True Loyalists. The True Loyalists not only followed all of their instructions to a tee, but also anticipated the mandates and even helped usher them in. They were the people who were literally alluding to the fact that we might need mandates before there was any mention of mandates on network television. They were the ones who were using the "seat belt" analogy, claiming that asking people to take an experimental injection was more or less the same thing as asking people to wear seatbelts. I won't waste time here tearing apart that positively piss poor analogy.

They remain committed to the false narrative and committed to the revisionist history that goes along with it, but very few, as I stated above, have kept up to date with their "boosters." Those who did, would be found in this special category of True Loyalist. Challenge them with questions concerning what they have contributed to, and they will immediately start grasping for straws in a hopeless attempt to justify the sheer senselessness of it all.

2) The MAGA Loyalists — while special contempt should be retained for the liberals, neoliberals, whatever you want to call them. So-called conservatives and MAGA supporters should not be let off the hook here either. Trump has literally referred to himself as "the father of the vaccine." However, when confronted on the subject of vaccine injury and the fact of the "vaccines" being harmful and ineffective, he immediately blows it off and changes the subject. He has never been pinned down and forced to address the harm that has resulted from Operation Warp Speed. People can make up whatever conception of things and reconfiguration of things that they would like, but I repeat — Operation Warp Speed was and is the hallmark of the Trump administration. That statement is based on a simple recognition of historical fact. A good percentage of the medical freedom movement are people who identify themselves as part of the MAGA movement. Many of these people attend vaccine-injured and covid-justice focused Twitter spaces. They subscribe to multiple medical freedom substacks. They may even consider, as I do, medical freedom to be the issue of our times — yet they give Donald Trump, the man I call, Trauma Dump, a free pass for his role in the ordeal.

As far as I'm concerned, Donald Trump threw the grapefruit and Joe Biden hit it out of the park with his dehumanizing medical mandates. Donald Trump threw the jab (pardon the pun) and Joe Biden followed up with the right cross that sent us tumbling to the canvas.

To be a medical freedom activist and completely absolve Trump of his role in the nightmare of unleashing mRNA on the global public is simply not a coherent position to take.

3) The Unvaccinated Loyalist — The Unvaccinated loyalists are people who didn't take the shot. I'll even go ahead and say that they are informed about the harm it has inflicted but have remained loyal to the Democrats who mandated them. They know about the myocarditis and the pericarditis. They know about the fatal blood clots. They even know about the turbo cancers. They have vaccine injured friends and family members — they may have even lost a loved one! Yet, they will go to the polls and cast a vote for the political party that carried out this assassination attempt against them and their families, still claiming they are supporting the “lesser of two evils.” I'm sad to say that I have family members who fall into this category. I can only describe it as a next-level Stockholm Syndrome. Stockholm Syndrome to the nth degree. You wish you could shake them and say, “They tried to kill you. WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT?

4) The Silently Injured — For people who have made the connection (the process by which people do that varies on a case by case basis), many fall into the category of The Silently Injured. They have new health problems. They know their bodies and they know it's from the shots (or the "shot"). There's no doubt in their minds what the cause is, but they won't speak out about it for the simple fact that they don't want to incur the ire endured by an anti-vaxxer. They already face the distressing reality of having to deal with a health condition, who would want to endure the additional "side-effect" of being outcasted and ridiculed.

Because of my medical freedom journalism, people have approached me in confidence to share that they are vaccine injured and to admit that they made a huge mistake when they bought into the narrative. In addition to their physical suffering, they suffer from the anguish associated with a severe case of buyers’ remorse.

They trusted a product, got injured by it, and then idiotically get labeled "anti-vaxxers." This automatic branding of the vaccine-injured as "anti-vaxxers" is an exceedingly stupid assertion. They're not anti-vaxxers — they took a vaccine (product falsely marketed as such) and got injured by it. Anti-vaxxers don't take vaccines!

5) The Anti Antivax Anti-vaxxer — the Anti Antivax Anti-vaxxer (AAA) — not to be confused with the American Automobile Association — seems counterintuitive yes, but I will do my best to explain. For many of us dubbed "the unvaccinated" during Covid (the Convid Scamdemic) flying underneath the radar was the preferred strategy. They were disciplined to not expose themselves on social media. They were more or less skilled in the art of keeping their mouths shut. All an AAA needed was a fake vaccine card and they were pretty much good to go. Once the smoke had cleared and most mandates were lifted, they didn't want to talk about it. They succeeded in not drawing attention to themselves and they'd rather put the whole thing behind them.

The outspoken anti-vaxxer, the anti-vax activist is an irritation to an AAA given the simple fact that they are dragging out a conversation the AAA would prefer to just end. The pro-vaxxers don't want to talk about it because they all have egg on their face and while of course they won't admit it, they know the whole thing was a gigantic debacle. It's only the pesky anti-vax activists continuing to insist on having the conversation we're not supposed to have and continuing to shine light where it's not supposed to be shone.

The AAA while being perfectly certain they did not want to receive the injection and making sure they didn't, could simply not deal with the political components of all that was occurring around them. (When I say "political" I am not referring to red-coat versus blue-coat nonsense. I am referring to the actual power that people exert over other people in everyday life, in the so-called real world.)

There's another type of AAA however. This second type tends to be more intense because it is a mindset rooted in deep shame. It's the people who knew well enough to not take the shot themselves but feel tremendous guilt for allowing their loved ones or even their own children to take it (to fulfill the requirements for attending college, etc). For many people, not taking the shots was the peak of the stand they were going to take. Actively discouraging others was a step past what they were prepared to do — and now they (usually secretly) regret that. Again, the anti-vax activist is a thorn in their side. Reminding them of something with which they have not come to terms and for which there is no recourse.

I am sure there are many other types that we could outline and I would love to hear what you, my astute readers, might suggest in this respect. What are some of the “types” that you have come across since we breached the event horizon of the reality-altering event that was "Covid"?